Robert Robb:
'I usually disagree with John McCain about foreign policy. He is the nation's foremost advocate of a muscular U.S. role in the world. I'm generally skeptical of U.S. involvement in foreign conflicts and disputes.
However, McCain does have a point, and a very important one, about an incongruity in the announced Obama administration approach to fighting the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria.
The administration is vague about this, but the clear inference is that the United States plans to assist FSA when it fights ISIS and try to stay out of its fight with Assad.
This has problems, logically and practically. If the United States is counting on FSA to be the force that ultimately "destroys" ISIS, how can we stand aside while Assad's forces diminish its fighting capability? And if we are providing air support to FSA fighting ISIS in Syria, how can we not provide air cover for it against attacks from Assad's forces?
McCain's preference, of course, is for the United States to go all in and provide FSA the training, equipment and air support needed to prevail against both ISIS and Assad.'